QUT Home
HR Home HR Information Jobs at QUT Information for Managers Information for Staff New to QUT? Health and Safety

Guidelines for Writing Academic Selection Criteria

Information for Managers
Employing Staff
  Policy
  Forms
  Checklist
  Advertising Format
  Advertising Cut-offs
  Salary Scales
  Oncosts
  Academic Selection Criteria
  * Guidelines for Writing Academic Selection Criteria
  Expressions of Interest
  Temp Agency Staff
  Indigenous Employment Strategy
  Recruitment Expenses
  Orientation of New Staff
Workplace Induction
Creating and Managing a Position
Managing Staff
Developing Staff
Employment Agreements
Policies and Guidelines
Workforce Planning

This information should be read in conjunction with

General considerations

What are selection criteria?

Selection criteria detail the

required to successfully undertake the duties of each level of academic position: associate lecturer, lecturer, senior lecturer, associate professor, and professor.

The selection criteria are used to assess each applicant for a position and are the tool by which selection panels shortlist applicants for interview and determine the most appointable candidate.

Selection criteria for all academic positions must be:

Position classification standards

Selection criteria for academic positions must be consistent with the Position Classification Standard for the appropriate academic level of appointment.

The Position Classification Standards are outlined in the QUT Enterprise Bargaining Agreement (Academic Staff).

The Position Classification Standards are generic statements used to describe the broad categories of responsibilities attached to academic positions at different levels.

The Position Classification Standards provide the basis to differentiate between the various levels of appointment and define the broad relationships between classifications

The Standards have three parts:

The specific duties section may assist in developing selection criteria for a position.

Selection panels may tailor these descriptors to make them more relevant to the position and the organisational area.

Essential and desirable criteria

Selection criteria can be defined as essential or desirable.

Essential criteria are those that the candidate must have or be capable of acquiring in order to successfully perform the duties of the position.

Desirable are those that would be an advantage to the candidate and the organisational area but are not critical in performing the duties of the position.

For all supervisory positions demonstrated knowledge of equal opportunity and workplace health and safety principles should be included as essential criteria.

Desirable criteria are useful in assisting the selection panel distinguish between candidates who have equal claims when assessed against all the essential selection criteria.

It is not necessary to provide desirable criteria where the essential criteria are seen as sufficient in defining the requirements of the position.

Weighting

The selection panel may weight the criteria to reflect the relative importance of each criterion to the role and to the direction of the discipline.

If the selection panel decide to weight the criteria the weightings must be published so that candidates are aware of the weightings.

Selection criteria for academic positions

Each level of academic appointment has requirements in relation to qualifications and the three generic selection criteria.

These generic selection criteria being:

These are outlined in the policy Duty Statements and Selection Criteria.

Selection panels may expand upon or add to these criteria to make them more relevant to the requirements of the position and to the needs of the organisational area and discipline.

It should be noted however, that any tailoring of the criteria must be consistent with the Position Classification Standards for the level of appointment.

Examples of how the qualifications requirements and the generic criteria may be tailored are outlined below.

These examples do not relate to any one level of academic appointment but range across all levels of appointment.

Qualifications and experience

Qualifications

Whilst the qualifications statements for each level of academic appointment are specific in seeking four years tertiary study, masters, or doctoral qualifications, the selection panel should determine whether study in a particular field is essential and specify this in the qualifications statement.

Examples are:

Further Requirements

Many positions have further requirements related to the qualifications and professional accreditation or standing required of the position, namely, eligibility for membership or membership of particular regulatory bodies, professional associations and so on.

Specific examples are:

Where these requirements are essential to the candidate’s ability to undertake the duties of the position and contribute to the direction of the discipline and organisational area, they must be included in the essential selection criteria for the position.

Areas of Experience

In addition, if there are specific areas of experience that the candidate must have in order to meet the defined needs of the organisational area these must also be included in the selection criteria.

This experience must be defined as essential to the requirements of the position, or desirable if it would be advantageous. Examples are:

Academic and professional leadership

Requirements under this criterion may include:

Teaching and learning

One of the most common additions to this criterion is where the position is required to supervise student activity in forums other than the classroom and other standard teaching space.

Examples are:

There may also be specific subjects or units that the appointee will be responsible for and these can be included in this criterion, for example:

If there is a regular requirement for the position to teach large units, the selection panel may also seek evidence of the candidate’s ability, for example:

Research

Where the organisational area is seeking to develop research in particular areas/fields, this criterion should specify the evidence sought by the selection panel.

Examples are:

Other skills and attributes

In addition to the qualification requirements and the three generic selection criteria there will be other skills and attributes essential to satisfactory performance in a position.

These other attributes are often just as necessary to effective performance in an academic role as the requirements in relation to the other selection criteria.

Organisational areas should carefully consider the types of skills and attributes necessary or desirable to the position and discipline and should be explicit in describing these within the selection criteria.

Examples are:

Further guidance in writing academic selection criteria is available from the Senior Human Resources Advisor for your area.